Last mentioned: 2h ago
Trade Investigations
The administration conducts probes into unfair trade practices to justify permanent duties.
Tariff Implementation
A 10% global tariff is enacted for a 150-day temporary window.
Geopolitical RegTech
Compliance shifts toward managing vulnerabilities in weaponised global networks.
Statutory Deadline
150-day limit for Section 122 tariffs expires unless extended by Congress.
Expiration Date
The 150-day temporary allowance for the current 15% tariff is set to expire.
Tariff Expiration
Projected expiration of Section 122 tariffs unless Congressional extension is granted.
Summit Commencement
President Trump arrives in Beijing for three days of high-level trade negotiations.
Legal Challenges
Anticipated window for industry trade groups to file for emergency injunctions.
Deadline Expiration
The earliest date the 10-day window could close, potentially triggering new regulatory actions.
Expected Implementation
Target date for the new tariff regime to take effect at U.S. ports of entry.
CIT Implementation (Expected)
The Court of International Trade is expected to begin establishing refund procedures for importers.
Legal Challenges
Expected deadline for trade associations to file for preliminary injunctions in federal court.
Implementation Window
Expected date for CBP to begin enforcing new 10% duty rates.
CBP Deadline
Expected date for Customs to issue new guidance on duty collection and refunds.
Expected Implementation
Anticipated period for the U.S. Department of Commerce to formalize the delisting in the Federal Register.
Geneva Summit
Scheduled meeting between Abbas Araghchi and Steve Witkoff to discuss the nuclear draft.
Mid-Point Review
Expected date for initial diplomatic feedback or escalation of rhetoric.
Expected Arrival
Projected window for the tanker to enter Cuban territorial waters, forcing a U.S. response decision.
Effective Date
The new 10% global tariff officially takes effect for all imports entering the United States.
Implementation Date
Tariffs are scheduled to go into effect at 12:01 a.m. ET according to White House fact sheets.
The US Supreme Court has struck down emergency tariffs implemented by the Trump administration, providing immediate relief to major trading partners like China and India. This landmark ruling curtails executive authority over trade policy and signals a significant shift in the global regulatory landscape for cross-border commerce.
India and the United States have indefinitely postponed high-level trade negotiations following a landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling that shifts tariff-setting authority from the President to Congress. The delay comes as President Trump retaliated against the judicial check by imposing a 15% blanket tariff on all imports, including those from India.
The U.S. Supreme Court has struck down the executive branch's use of emergency laws to impose broad tariffs, forcing a pivot to a new 15% global tariff framework. Simultaneously, the U.S. is engaging in high-stakes diplomacy with Iran in Geneva, backed by a massive military buildup, to secure a new nuclear agreement.
The European Commission is demanding clarity from Washington after President Trump imposed a 15% global tariff hike immediately following a Supreme Court ruling that curtailed his trade powers. The move threatens a fragile year-old trade agreement and has prompted the European Parliament to consider freezing legislative work on the deal.
Political scientist Abraham Newman warns of a shift from decentralized globalization to a 'weaponised' world where states leverage centralized economic hubs for coercion. This transition, accelerated in President Donald Trump’s second term, transforms global tech and finance networks into tools of statecraft and surveillance.
The US Supreme Court has invalidated the administration's use of emergency powers for global tariffs, prompting an immediate pivot to Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act. This new strategy imposes a 15% temporary tariff on all imports, creating a high-stakes legal and compliance challenge for global trade partners.
US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer has confirmed that bilateral trade agreements remain legally binding despite a recent Supreme Court ruling against the administration's tariff authority. The statement aims to provide market certainty and prevent the unraveling of complex international trade frameworks.
The European Union has formally called on the United States to uphold its international trade commitments following a landmark U.S. court ruling that blocked the implementation of new tariffs. The judicial intervention creates a significant legal hurdle for the Trump administration's protectionist agenda and introduces a period of regulatory uncertainty for transatlantic trade.
The Australian government is exploring all legal and diplomatic avenues to counter a new 15% blanket tariff on foreign imports imposed by US President Donald Trump. Canberra has officially labeled the trade barriers as 'unjustified,' signaling a potential challenge to the long-standing bilateral free trade agreement.
A landmark judicial ruling against the expansion of Section 301 tariffs on Chinese imports has introduced significant legal and regulatory uncertainty for U.S. importers. The decision, centered on procedural failures under the Administrative Procedure Act, could trigger massive refund claims and force a complete overhaul of global trade compliance strategies.
Renewed calls for broad-based U.S. tariffs by Donald Trump threaten to erode the competitive edge Australian exporters have maintained through bilateral trade agreements. This shift toward aggressive protectionism could force a massive recalibration of trade compliance frameworks and supply chain legal strategies.
President Trump has unilaterally increased the global import duty to 15%, bypassing a Supreme Court ruling that struck down his previous tariff regime. The move utilizes a temporary 150-day legal mechanism to maintain aggressive trade policies while sparking a constitutional confrontation with the judiciary.
President Donald Trump has escalated global import duties to a 15% maximum, pivoting to Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act after the Supreme Court invalidated his previous emergency-power tariffs. This temporary measure faces a 150-day legislative deadline and significant skepticism from a Republican-controlled Congress concerned about inflation.
Former President Donald Trump has issued a sharp critique of the Supreme Court following a legal defeat that curtails the executive branch's authority to impose unilateral tariffs. The ruling marks a significant shift in international trade law, reinforcing the 'Major Questions Doctrine' and requiring clearer congressional authorization for economic interventions.
The Supreme Court has issued a landmark 6-3 ruling limiting the President's authority to impose broad-based tariffs without explicit Congressional approval. The decision applies the 'Major Questions Doctrine' to trade law, effectively staying the administration's 10% universal baseline tariff and creating a new era of legislative-heavy trade compliance.
President Donald Trump has officially raised the United States' universal baseline tariff to 15%, a move that fundamentally reshapes global trade dynamics and executive authority. This action triggers immediate compliance hurdles for multinational corporations and sets the stage for significant legal challenges regarding trade law precedents.
President Trump has announced an immediate escalation of global tariffs from 10% to 15%, creating an urgent compliance crisis for multinational corporations. The move, described as 'effective immediately,' forces a rapid pivot for trade legal teams and regulatory technology providers tasked with managing real-time duty adjustments.
A tanker carrying Russian fuel is currently en route to Cuba, marking the first major challenge to the Trump administration's maritime blockade. This development forces a critical test of U.S. sanctions enforcement and the regulatory frameworks governing international shipping and energy transfers.
The Supreme Court's decision to limit executive tariff authority has triggered a sharp rebuke from Donald Trump and a critical economic analysis from Peter Schiff. This ruling marks a significant shift in trade law, potentially curbing the President's ability to unilaterally impose economic penalties.
The Trump administration has signaled a significant pivot in export control policy by agreeing to remove Vietnam from the restricted U.S. technology list. This move, announced by Hanoi, is expected to streamline high-tech transfers and bolster strategic industrial partnerships, particularly benefiting major U.S. exporters like Boeing.