The Supreme Court issued a fractured pair of rulings on presidential removal power, allowing Fed's Lisa Cook to remain while FTC's Rebecca Slaughter was removed, directly overturning the 91-year-old Humphrey’s Executor precedent. This split decision redefines the contours of independent agency protections and portends a wave of litigation over the unitary executive theory.
Source: wtag.iheart.com · newsradiori.iheart.com
As the 2025–2026 term closes, the Supreme Court will rule on three cases challenging presidential authority to fire independent agency officials and curtail birthright citizenship. For-cause removal protections and unitary executive theory hang in the balance, with potentially sweeping implications for administrative law.
Source: wiky.com · merimbulanewsweekly.com.au
The Supreme Court's rush to decide 23 cases—including a pivotal birthright citizenship executive order—will set new boundaries for presidential power and directly impact immigration compliance, identity verification, and the regulatory technology sector.
Source: fox5dc.com · fox2detroit.com
The Trump administration has imposed double-digit tariffs on over 60 countries under Section 301 of the Trade Act, citing forced labor. Legal experts question whether this use of executive power circumvents the Supreme Court's February tariff ruling and violates the separation of powers.
Source: thepeterboroughexaminer.com · clickondetroit.com
The 'Big Beautiful Bill' dismantles Biden's SAVE plan, imposes a $65K borrowing cap, and transfers student aid to Treasury. Legal experts question the authority to abruptly end income-driven repayment benefits and flag due process concerns under the APA.
President Trump’s executive order freezing a federal investigation into BAE Systems’ Norfolk shipyard over sexual harassment and discrimination raises profound questions about executive power over independent enforcement. The case, which could have led to seven-figure payouts, highlights the fragility of civil rights protections for federal contractors.
Source: dailypress.com · pilotonline.com
A federal appeals court has issued an emergency stay that temporarily prevents the Trump administration from ending Temporary Protected Status for approximately 350,000 Haitian nationals. The ruling provides a short reprieve while legal challenges continue, raising complex questions about the scope of judicial review and agency discretion in immigration law. Plaintiffs are now racing to amend their lawsuit by July 31 to avoid the Supreme Court's recent jurisdictional bar.
Source: newstalk1230.iheart.com · wwnc.iheart.com
Trump's replacement tariffs, intended to be 'more legally durable,' are still expected to face court battles as economists question their legality. The carveouts may offer some defense, but the administration's trade authority is likely to be tested again.
The Trump administration’s court admission that it canceled $7.6 billion in clean energy grants purely based on states’ voting patterns opens the door to constitutional challenges and potential damages under the Administrative Procedure Act. Allegations of weaponized federal funding could set new precedents for judicial review of executive grant-making.
Source: wdsu.com · wapt.com
After a Supreme Court defeat, the Trump administration shifts to court-tested trade laws, imposing new Section 301 tariffs on 60 countries. This legal pivot signals a durable tariff wall, with more trade actions on the horizon.
The U.S. government’s move to restrict OpenAI’s GPT-5.6 rollout highlights a legal grey zone where executive action substitutes for clear statutory authority, raising questions about export control over domestic AI deployments.
The resumption of Planned Parenthood's Medicaid billing after a year-long defunding freeze presents a rich case study in regulatory law, administrative agency action, and the ongoing legal battles over reproductive rights. Nearly 30 clinic closures and severe service cuts raise questions about the constitutionality of defunding provisions and the future of abortion-related litigation.
Source: yahoo.com · winnipegfreepress.com
The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the Trump administration's bid to reinstate a $100,000 fee on new H-1B visas, affirming a lower court ruling that the charge is an unconstitutional tax. For legal professionals, this decision underscores the judiciary's role in enforcing separation-of-powers limits on executive fee-setting authority and provides a template for challenging similar regulatory overreach.
Source: Naman Trivedi (in) · businessinsider.com
A lawsuit filed on the day Trump imposed new forced-labor tariffs argues the duties lack the country-specific findings required under Section 301, continuing a pattern of executive overreach that the Supreme Court condemned in February. The case could redefine the limits of presidential tariff authority.
Source: Reuters (cn) · Al Jazeera (QA)
The US has imposed a 10% tariff on Indian imports under Section 301, rewarding India’s new forced-labour ban with a rate reduction from 12.5%. This novel use of trade law to enforce labour standards raises significant questions about WTO compliance and the extraterritorial reach of domestic prohibitions.
The Trump administration's new Section 301 tariffs, covering nearly all U.S. imports with a forced labor justification, mark a legal recalibration after the Supreme Court struck down broader trade actions. Legal experts anticipate constitutional and statutory challenges to these measures, which also face potential WTO disputes. The ongoing USTR probe into 16 nations for overproduction signals further regulatory moves.
Source: wmtw.com · wisn.com
After the Supreme Court struck down Trump's tariff powers, the U.S. pivots to a forced labor ban to levy 10-12.5% duties on 60 trading partners. This shift tests the boundaries of trade authority and potential WTO compliance.
The Trump administration will impose new tariffs of 10% and 12.5% on 60 trading partners under Section 301 of the Trade Act, circumventing a Supreme Court ruling that struck down earlier IEEPA-based duties. The measures cover 99.4% of imports but exempt key commodities, and are tied to forced labour enforcement. Legal experts see reduced litigation risk but potential WTO challenges remain.
Source: Billy Freeman (gb) · David Lawder (au)
President Trump's January 2025 executive order to reinstate vaccine-refusing service members has stalled, with applicants waiting over 17 months. The delay raises serious questions about executive order enforceability, administrative law, and service member rights.
The European Commission imposed a €890 million fine on Google for breaching the Digital Markets Act’s ban on self-preferencing, marking the first major DMA penalty of its kind. The decision targets Google Play and Search, setting a landmark precedent for gatekeeper obligations and reshaping compliance expectations across the tech sector.
Source: theadvocate.com.au · easternriverinachronicle.com.au