Legal entity

Los Angeles Superior Court

Company

All 1 tracked stories fall under one category: court-decisions. Ariana Madix is the most frequent co-covered peer, appearing in 1 of the 1 tracked story. The tracked stories average 2 original sources each. Los Angeles Superior Court appears in 1 tracked Legal story from August 6, 2026.

Last mentioned: Aug 6, 2026

RSS updates
Share

Entity pulse

Recent coverage · Los Angeles Superior Court

1 story
5 avg impact
0% positive
0% negative
  • 100% neutral

Figures are computed live from our source-verified story record — see our methodology for how impact and sentiment are derived.

What the coverage shows about Los Angeles Superior Court

All 1 tracked stories fall under one category: court-decisions. Ariana Madix is the most frequent co-covered peer, appearing in 1 of the 1 tracked story. The tracked stories average 2 original sources each. Los Angeles Superior Court appears in 1 tracked Legal story from August 6, 2026.

Stories tracked
1
Sources per story
2

Computed from the 1 stories linked to this entity, with beat comparisons drawn from all 11 Legal stories published in the same date window. Shares are omitted below five stories and comparisons below a twenty-story baseline.

Coverage cohort

Appears alongside

Other entities that clear the same relevance threshold in stories also covering Los Angeles Superior Court. Shared-story counts are live from our verified record — not editorial picks.

Timeline

  1. Status Hearing Scheduled

    The trial court sets a status hearing to resume proceedings after the two-year appellate delay, allowing discovery and further litigation to commence.

  2. Appellate Court Affirms Ruling

    The California Court of Appeal upholds the lower court’s decision, finding Madix failed to meet her burden under the anti-SLAPP law, and lifts the stay on the case.

  3. Lower Court Denies Anti-SLAPP Motion

    A trial court judge rules that Madix’s alleged conduct was not protected speech because it was unlawful, rejecting her request to strike the lawsuit under the anti-SLAPP statute.

  4. Revenge Porn Lawsuit Filed

    Leviss files a civil complaint against Madix and Sandoval in Los Angeles Superior Court, alleging invasion of privacy, eavesdropping, and violation of California’s revenge porn statute.

  5. Scandoval Erupts

    Ariana Madix discovers Tom Sandoval's affair with Rachel Leviss, leading to widespread media coverage and the breakup of their long-term relationship.

Stories mentioning Los Angeles Superior Court 1

Court Decisions Neutral

After 2-Year Halt, Appeals Court Rules Madix Must Face Revenge Porn Claims

The California Court of Appeal affirmed that Ariana Madix cannot use the anti-SLAPP statute to dismiss Rachel Leviss’s revenge porn lawsuit, setting the stage for a trial over alleged non-consensual sharing of explicit videos. The ruling clarifies that unlawful conduct—even if intertwined with a public scandal—does not qualify for free speech protection under California law.

2 sources

Source: Nancy Dillon (us) · Kaitlin Simpson (us)

Los Angeles Superior Court is linked from 1 story on this site, each scored at or above our 35% relevance threshold — see how these pages are built.

See something wrong on this page — a misattributed entity, a wrong stat, a broken source link? Report a data issue.