The Third Circuit became the first federal appellate court to strike down a state ban on assault weapons and large-capacity magazines, ruling New Jersey's law unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. This decision deepens a circuit split ahead of a Supreme Court review of semiautomatic rifle bans, with implications for gun control statutes nationwide. Legal analysts see the ruling as a significant expansion of the post-Bruen framework.
Source: theguardian.com · yahoo.com
The Third Circuit struck down New Jersey’s assault weapon and magazine bans under the Supreme Court’s Bruen test, holding that semiautomatic firearms are Second‑Amendment arms. The ruling deepens a circuit split and sets up possible Supreme Court review.
Source: Matthew Vadum (us) · Matthew Vadum (us)
A U.S. Senate candidate’s renewed impeachment call against two Supreme Court justices amplifies demands for judicial ethics reform and new compliance tools in the legal sector. The move reignites debate over binding conduct codes for the high court.
Source: foxreno.com · ktul.com
The Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision in *Slaughter v. Trump* dismantles the 1935 Humphrey’s Executor doctrine, granting the president at-will removal power over independent agency heads. A separate ruling preserves the Fed’s insulation, creating a fractured precedent for administrative law. The decisions reshape constitutional separation-of-powers analysis and raise urgent questions about the future of regulatory independence.
President Trump’s extraordinary request for the Supreme Court to rehear its June 30 birthright citizenship ruling tests procedural norms—the last rehearing granted was in 1965. Legal experts view the move as symbolic but it keeps constitutional and procedural law in the spotlight.
Source: scotusblog.com · 600wmtradio.iheart.com
The US Supreme Court ruled 6-3 against President Trump’s attempt to curb birthright citizenship, anchoring the decision in the 128-year-old Wong Kim Ark precedent. Chief Justice Roberts’ opinion reinforces constitutional limits on executive power, while a concurrence and dissent expose doctrinal fault lines. Any path forward now lies with Congress—or a near-impossible constitutional amendment.
Source: thehindubusinessline.com · abc.net.au
The EEOC's recision of its 1979 affirmative action guidance strips away a key compliance shield, forcing employers to reassess the legality of all race- and sex-conscious employment practices. This regulatory shift aligns with recent Supreme Court precedent and invites heightened scrutiny from the agency and private litigants. Legal advisors must urgently guide clients through a privileged audit to mitigate exposure.
The Supreme Court’s rejection of Trump’s birthright citizenship order provides essential clarity on the 14th Amendment’s jurisdiction clause and opens the door for potential legislative changes, impacting immigration law and RegTech compliance systems.
Source: Matthew Vadum (us) · Matthew Vadum (us)
The Supreme Court's 5-4 decision in Trump v. Barbara declares Executive Order 14160 unconstitutional, cementing the Fourteenth Amendment's broad birthright citizenship guarantee. Justice Kavanaugh's concurrence, however, suggests Congress might legislate changes, creating a new front for immigration law practitioners.
Source: National Law Review · Morgan Marietta (AU)
The Supreme Court’s decision in Mullin v. Doe eliminates judicial barriers to ending TPS for Haiti and Syria, holding that the statute bars review of most nonconstitutional challenges. Attorneys must now advise clients on the narrowed scope of judicial oversight and the practical compliance steps as DHS prepares termination guidance.
Source: National Law Review · National Law Review
The Supreme Court's June 30, 2026 ruling reaffirms the 14th Amendment's guarantee of citizenship to all persons born on U.S. soil, regardless of parents' immigration status. The decision blocks a 2025 Trump order, reinforcing the constitutional limits of executive power over immigration.
Source: abc11.com · abc13.com
The Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision overturning Humphrey’s Executor allows presidents to fire heads of independent agencies at will, concentrating executive power. Legal analysts warn the ruling could politicize antitrust enforcement, energy regulation, and financial oversight, upending decades of administrative law doctrine.
Source: Guest Contributor (us) · CleanTechnica
The Supreme Court declined to review an Eighth Circuit ruling that eliminates private lawsuits to enforce Section 208 of the Voting Rights Act, creating a circuit split and raising constitutional questions about implied rights of action. Legal professionals should note the deepening impact of Justice Gorsuch's 2021 concurrence, now reshaping litigation strategies across the Seventh Circuit and beyond.
Source: wcti12.com · news3lv.com
Despite state bans, U.S. abortions nearly doubled, fueled by telehealth pill delivery across state lines. This exposes legal tensions between state authority, FDA preemption, and 19th-century obscenity statutes.
The AP-NORC survey reveals deep legal anxiety among AAPI adults, driven by denaturalization lawsuits, pending birthright citizenship ruling, and aggressive ICE enforcement. The 14th Amendment's future and due process concerns are central to this erosion of confidence.
Source: Lucy Quaggin (hk) · Lucy Quaggin (hk)
The Justice Department’s aggressive post-Students for Fair Admissions enforcement has ensnared UC Davis Medical School, with 100 active investigations and 30 targeting medical institutions. Assistant AG Harmeet Dhillon’s rhetoric framing the conduct as fraud signals possible False Claims Act litigation and raises First Amendment and equal protection questions for higher education nationwide.
Source: ktxs.com · abc7amarillo.com
The Supreme Court’s unanimous decision in Sripetch v. SEC holds that the SEC may obtain disgorgement of ill-gotten gains without proving pecuniary loss, resolving a circuit split and providing clarity on the scope of equitable remedies, while Justice Thomas’s concurrence raises new constitutional questions.
Source: National Law Review · National Law Review
A Federal Circuit stay preserves Trump’s 10% global tariff, finding the government likely to prevail on its novel interpretation of the Trade Act. The decision tests whether trade deficits are “fundamental international payments problems,” with major implications for executive tariff authority.
The Supreme Court’s June 4, 2026 decision in Sripetch v. SEC removes the pecuniary-loss requirement for disgorgement, resolving a circuit split and strengthening the Commission’s enforcement posture. The ruling directly affects how securities-fraud defendants negotiate and litigate equitable remedies. Legal practitioners must now reassess defense strategies and compliance exposure in microcap and pump-and-dump matters.
Source: National Law Review · National Law Review
The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear the appeal of Priscilla Villarreal, a Texas journalist arrested for seeking non-public information from police. The decision leaves intact a lower court ruling that granted qualified immunity to the arresting officers, raising significant concerns regarding First Amendment protections for investigative reporting.
Source: sandiegouniontribune.com · twincities.com