Legal entity

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

government agency

regulation is the sole category represented across all 1 tracked stories. Antonin Scalia is the most frequent co-covered peer, appearing in 1 of the 1 tracked story. Each carries 2 original sources on average. We currently track 1 Legal story that mention U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, all published on July 15, 2026.

Last mentioned: Jul 15, 2026

Entity pulse

Recent coverage · U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

1 story
7 avg impact
0% positive
0% negative
  • 100% neutral

Figures are computed live from our source-verified story record — see our methodology for how impact and sentiment are derived.

What the coverage shows about U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

regulation is the sole category represented across all 1 tracked stories. Antonin Scalia is the most frequent co-covered peer, appearing in 1 of the 1 tracked story. Each carries 2 original sources on average. We currently track 1 Legal story that mention U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, all published on July 15, 2026.

Stories tracked
1
Sources per story
2

Computed from the 1 stories linked to this entity, with beat comparisons drawn from all 12 Legal stories published in the same date window. Shares are omitted below five stories and comparisons below a twenty-story baseline.

Coverage cohort

Appears alongside

Other entities that clear the same relevance threshold in stories also covering U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Shared-story counts are live from our verified record — not editorial picks.

Timeline

  1. Effective Date

    The rescission takes effect; 'harm' no longer includes indirect habitat modification.

  2. Final Rule Published in Federal Register

    FWS and NMFS formally publish the final rescission rule, triggering 60-day effective countdown.

  3. Joint Announcement

    U.S. Department of the Interior and U.S. Department of Commerce announce final rule rescinding the 'harm' definition.

  4. Proposed Rule Released

    FWS and NMFS publish proposed rule to rescind the 'harm' definition, initiating public comment period.

  5. Babbitt v. Sweet Home Decision

    Supreme Court upholds regulatory 'harm' definition including habitat modification; Justice Scalia files dissent.

Stories mentioning U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1

Regulation Neutral

ESA 'Harm' Rule Gone: Agencies Adopt Scalia Dissent, Effective Sept. 12, 2026

Federal agencies have finalized the rescission of the Endangered Species Act's 'harm' definition, replacing it with Justice Scalia's dissent interpretation. This dramatically narrows what constitutes a prohibited 'take' and eliminates indirect habitat liability, creating significant legal uncertainty and anticipated litigation from conservation groups.

2 sources

Source: National Law Review · National Law Review

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is linked from 1 story on this site, each scored at or above our 35% relevance threshold — see how these pages are built.

See something wrong on this page — a misattributed entity, a wrong stat, a broken source link? Report a data issue.