CBP Agent Faces 10 Civil Rights Counts as Victim Testifies

For legal professionals, the trial of a federal Customs and Border Protection agent on 10 counts of deprivation of rights under color of law offers a textbook study of 18 U.S.C. § 242 prosecutions. The government must prove Uribe acted willfully under color of law while allegedly using his badge and service weapon against immigrant women—an evidentiary challenge that turns on victim credibility, community-generated identification, and proof of a pattern across four alleged victims. The proceedings at the Dirksen U.S. Courthouse may shape how future cases involving federal officers and marginalized witnesses are litigated.

The federal trial of Luis Uribe, a 45-year-old veteran U.S. Customs and Border Protection agent, opened a disturbing window into allegations that he weaponized his badge and service weapon to prey on vulnerable Chinese immigrant women in Chicago's suburbs during 2022. On September 10, 2026, a woman identified only as 'Tina' took the stand at the Dirksen U.S. Courthouse and, through sobs, recounted an October 2, 2022 assault at a Days Inn in Schaumburg. She described opening her hotel room door expecting a hair dryer, only to have a man force his way inside, block the door with a chair, display a handgun and badge, and demand money. After she surrendered roughly $2,000 in cash brought from New York, the man pushed her into the bathroom, demanded oral sex, then pulled her back into the room and raped her. Days later, Tina said she told police the attacker matched a man in a photograph that had been circulated within the Chinese community as a warning; prosecutors displayed that image in court, and Tina identified the man as 'the fake police.' According to prosecutors, that man was Uribe.

“

After she surrendered roughly $2,000 in cash brought from New York, the man pushed her into the bathroom, demanded oral sex, then pulled her back into the room and raped her.

Uribe is charged with 10 counts of deprivation of rights under color of law and one count of brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence. The indictment alleges he used his official position as a CBP agent to commit a series of brazen attacks against four women, many connected with the Chinese sex industry, in 2022. One of the victims was allegedly assaulted on three separate occasions. The legal foundation of the case is significant: federal civil rights prosecutions under 18 U.S.C. § 242 require proof that a person acting under color of law willfully deprived another of rights secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States. If proven, the badge and gun are not incidental details—they are central to establishing that the accused acted not as a private criminal but as a government official abusing public authority. The brandishing charge adds a mandatory minimum sentence if convicted, reflecting the gravity of using a firearm in furtherance of a violent crime.

The case illustrates how predatory offenders may exploit the intersection of law enforcement authority and immigrant vulnerability. The alleged victims, described as connected to the Chinese sex industry, may have been targeted precisely because they were less likely to report crimes to police, feared deportation or criminal exposure, and operated in informal networks where a photograph warning could be more trusted than institutional law enforcement. The fact that a warning photo circulated months before the October attack—and that Tina recognized the man from that community-sourced image—underscores the protective role of diaspora networks when official channels fail.

From an evidentiary standpoint, the prosecution's reliance on victim testimony, community photographs, and corroborating circumstances highlights the challenges of color-of-law cases. There are often no independent witnesses to a hotel room assault, and forensic evidence can be complicated by delays in reporting. The jury will need to assess Tina's credibility, her identification of Uribe, and whether the totality of evidence overcomes doubt about whether the attacker was indeed a CBP agent using his authority. The defense is expected to challenge identification, the reliability of the photo warning, and the credibility of witnesses whose backgrounds may involve illegal activity. The outcome will hinge on whether the government can connect the alleged pattern to Uribe's specific conduct beyond one witness's account.