DBGI Targets Shorts on 2 Exchanges with 3-Part Audit, Retains Christian Attar

For securities litigators and market regulation attorneys, Digital Brands Group's announcement represents a bold, pre-litigation maneuver that could test the reach of Regulation SHO and state law claims against prime brokers. By issuing compliance demands directly to clearinghouses and building a forensic record through ShareIntel data, the company is positioning itself for a potential legal battle that may set new precedent on standing to demand settlement data and the duty of intermediaries to resolve persistent fails-to-deliver. The involvement of Christian Attar, a law firm synonymous with naked short litigation, signals a meticulous, evidence-driven approach that distinguishes this effort from typical retail-investor complaints.

Digital Brands Group (DBGI), a publicly traded apparel and e-commerce company, has escalated its confrontation with short sellers and clearing institutions by announcing it will submit compliance demands to clearinghouses and prime brokers, with a mandatory legal pursuit of any fails-to-deliver (FTDs) and volume anomalies. The move follows the July 6, 2026 retention of Christian Attar, a Houston-based law firm recognized for naked short selling and market manipulation litigation. The company claims its stock has been targeted by predatory trading practices, and it is now deploying a forensic audit to identify systemic settlement failures.

“

CEO Hil Davis adopted a combative posture, stating, "Digital Brands Group will maintain a zero-tolerance policy regarding predatory, abusive, and illegal trading practices that actively harm our retail shareholders and distort true market valuation.

The forensic audit, supported by daily data from ShareIntel, targets three specific areas: persistent unresolved FTDs, significant ongoing imbalances in clearance and settlement, and volume anomalies attributed to suspected ex-clearing transactions, offshore intra-clearing networks, and cross-border settlement imbalances between DBGI's primary NASDAQ listing (ticker: DBGI) and its secondary listing on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange (S8W; WKN: A3CQ98). By focusing on these multi-jurisdictional settlement channels, the company aims to uncover off-book liabilities that may distort its public float and harm retail shareholders.

CEO Hil Davis adopted a combative posture, stating, "Digital Brands Group will maintain a zero-tolerance policy regarding predatory, abusive, and illegal trading practices that actively harm our retail shareholders and distort true market valuation. We plan to hold any and all non-compliant clearing entities directly accountable." The announcement underscores a growing trend among micro- and small-cap companies to use legal threats against perceived market manipulation, particularly when traditional regulatory enforcement is perceived as insufficient.

The backdrop is the long-standing controversy over naked short selling and the efficacy of Regulation SHO, which requires broker-dealers to close out FTDs by purchasing shares after a certain threshold. Critics argue that persistent FTDs indicate widespread non-compliance, while market makers often attribute them to operational delays. Christian Attar's involvement signals a well-resourced litigation strategy; the firm has brought similar cases on behalf of other issuers, though outcomes have been mixed.

Market reaction to such announcements is often volatile. News of a potential short squeeze can drive speculative buying, but the underlying claims of manipulation remain unverified by independent authorities. DBGI's stock, which has experienced significant price swings in the past, may see increased attention from retail traders and short sellers alike. The company's decision to go public with its compliance demands could pressure clearinghouses to examine their books or invite counter-claims.