HHS Decertifies Kentucky OPO Over Safety Failures—55 OPOs Under Scrutiny

For legal professionals in healthcare regulation, this case marks a pivotal test of CMS decertification authority under the 2024 rule and the National Organ Transplant Act. The appeal by Network for Hope will examine whether ethical lapses from years earlier justify the ultimate penalty, and what procedural protections a regulated monopoly can expect before losing its exclusive territory.

The US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) moved on August 5, 2026, to decertify Network for Hope, a Kentucky-based organ procurement organization (OPO), citing persistent safety failures including a disturbing 2021 incident where the organization allegedly pressured a hospital to proceed with organ retrieval from a patient who showed signs of life. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. labeled the nonprofit a “bad apple” and announced the decertification process at a press briefing, flanked by the sister of the patient who survived the incident. Network for Hope strongly disputes the allegations and pledges to appeal, setting up a high-stakes legal battle over the boundaries of organ procurement oversight.

“

The appeal by Network for Hope will examine whether ethical lapses from years earlier justify the ultimate penalty, and what procedural protections a regulated monopoly can expect before losing its exclusive territory.

This case strikes at the heart of the US organ donation system, where 55 OPOs serve as the critical bridge between deceased donors and the more than 100,000 patients on the national transplant waiting list. OPOs are federally designated nonprofits with exclusive geographic monopolies, funded by Medicare, to coordinate organ recovery and matching. The decertification of a single OPO is a rare and extreme measure—the last such action occurred decades ago—and signals a new federal willingness to enforce stringent safety standards. The allegations against Network for Hope stem from an October 2021 case at a Louisville hospital where a man who had overdosed was being evaluated for organ donation after life support was planned for withdrawal. Despite signs that he was regaining consciousness, including squeezing a doctor's hand, the OPO's predecessor allegedly pushed to proceed, raising profound ethical questions about the rush to harvest organs. The man survived, and the case, along with a similar one in New York, triggered a nationwide spike in people revoking their organ donor registrations, shaking public confidence in the system.

Kennedy's move comes amid broader Trump administration efforts to overhaul health agencies, but it also highlights long-standing criticism of OPO performance variability. A 2022 congressional report found some OPOs recovering less than half the organs their donor populations could yield, and a new rule finalized in 2024 empowered the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to decertify low performers. Network for Hope’s decertification, however, is explicitly rooted in safety rather than performance metrics, potentially establishing a new precedent for removing OPOs based on ethical lapses. In response, Network for Hope points to a pioneering safeguard it implemented over a year ago—a “pause button” allowing anyone to halt donation planning if concerns arise—and asserts full compliance with federal policies. The appeal process will likely argue that HHS lacks authority to decertify for past actions under new leadership, or that the safety issues were isolated and corrective actions taken.