32-hour FLSA bill would lower overtime threshold from 40 hours

For wage-and-hour counsel, this is not just a policy debate — it is a potential amendment to the Fair Labor Standards Act, the statute that has defined federal overtime since 1938. The bill would change the point at which nonexempt employees become eligible for time-and-a-half and add a pay-protection directive that raises difficult questions about total weekly compensation, regular rate calculations, and scheduling buffers. Legal teams should watch the 180-day first reduction trigger and the lack of clarity around subsequent phase-in dates.

A proposal in Congress would amend the Fair Labor Standards Act to lower the federal overtime threshold from 40 hours to 32 hours per week, edging millions of nonexempt workers toward a 32-hour standard workweek without statutory pay or benefit cuts. Rep. Mark Takano (D-California) and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) reintroduced the Thirty-Two Hour Workweek Act on Sept. 8, 2026. Because the bill is framed as an amendment to the FLSA rather than a schedule mandate, its core legal effect would be to change the point at which covered workers qualify for overtime, not to require four eight-hour days or guarantee a three-day weekend.

“

For a $20-per-hour worker, that would shift the weekly wage bill from $800 to $880 if the schedule remains unchanged, before accounting for the separate prohibition on reducing total weekly compensation.

The existing FLSA has made 40 hours the federal overtime threshold since 1938. Under current rules, eligible workers must receive time-and-a-half only after working more than 40 hours in a week. The proposed bill would phase down that threshold to 32 hours, with the first reduction taking effect at least 180 days after enactment. After the applicable threshold becomes effective, employees would generally have to receive at least 1.5 times their regular pay rate for hours worked beyond it. The legislation also contains an anti-reduction provision: employers could not reduce an affected employee's total weekly compensation, regular pay rate, or benefits because of the shorter standard workweek. The stated intent is to let people work fewer hours without losing income, while employees who continue working beyond the new threshold would earn overtime.

The distinction between a threshold change and a scheduling mandate is important for implementation. Under a 32-hour overtime threshold, a nonexempt worker assigned 40 hours per week would be entitled to 32 hours at regular pay plus 8 hours at time-and-a-half, unless the employer changes scheduling. For a $20-per-hour worker, that would shift the weekly wage bill from $800 to $880 if the schedule remains unchanged, before accounting for the separate prohibition on reducing total weekly compensation. The pay-protection language creates a more complicated compliance question: if an employer reduces a worker's scheduled hours to 32 to avoid overtime, the employer may still be required to maintain that worker's total weekly compensation and benefits, potentially raising the effective regular hourly rate. The sources do not detail how "total weekly compensation" would be measured across pay periods, bonus structures, or variable schedules, leaving room for regulatory interpretation and litigation if the bill advances.

Sponsors argue federal labor standards have not kept pace with increases in worker productivity and developments such as AI, automation and other technology. The 40-hour standard, they note, was established nearly 90 years ago. This gives the bill a broad economic narrative but its direct policy tool is narrower: it does not redistribute productivity gains through a universal four-day week; it shifts the cost of longer schedules onto employers through overtime. For legal and regulatory audiences, the bill is a statutory intervention in wage-and-hour law that would require updated payroll rules, time-tracking, and classification review. For workforce and compensation leaders, it is a labor-cost and scheduling lever that intersects with salary exempt thresholds, state overtime rules, and collective bargaining agreements.