NY Severance Bill: 21-Day Review, 7-Day Revocation Mandate Awaits Governor

For employment lawyers and corporate counsel, this bill represents a monumental shift in New York’s severance landscape. By extending the rigid 21‑day consideration and 7‑day revocation protocol to every departing employee—not just those over forty—the Act creates a uniform, enforceable standard that will precipitate a wave of template revisions and require careful scrutiny of current separation negotiations. The immediate‑effect clause leaves no room for phased compliance; counsel must act now to insulate clients from the severe consequences of a void release.

New York’s Legislature has passed the “No Severance Ultimatums Act,” a bill that will, if signed by Governor Kathy Hochul, impose sweeping new requirements on all severance agreements offered to employees in the state. The Act adds Section 215-d to the New York Labor Law, effectively porting the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act’s (OWBPA) procedural safeguards — historically limited to age discrimination releases for workers forty and older — onto every employee termination, regardless of age, including those in government agencies. The key provisions are unambiguous: any agreement that requires an employee to waive claims in exchange for severance must now include a written notice of the right to consult an attorney, a minimum twenty-one calendar day consideration period, a seven calendar day revocation window after signing, and explicit language that the agreement is not effective or enforceable until the revocation period has passed. The employee may sign earlier, but only if the decision is truly voluntary and not induced by fraud, misrepresentation, threats to withdraw or alter the offer, or the promise of different terms for an early signature. Noncompliant agreements would be void and unenforceable, a catastrophic outcome that could force an employer to pay severance without obtaining the intended release.

“

New York’s Legislature has passed the “No Severance Ultimatums Act,” a bill that will, if signed by Governor Kathy Hochul, impose sweeping new requirements on all severance agreements offered to employees in the state.

The immediate context is New York’s well‑established pattern of employee‑protective legislation. Recent years have seen expansions of paid family leave, wage theft protections, and restrictions on non‑compete agreements. The No Severance Ultimatums Act fits squarely into this landscape, closing a perceived loophole whereby younger employees could be pressured into signing away rights without adequate time or legal advice. By codifying these protections under NYLL, the Legislature aims to eliminate so‑called “coercive severance ultimatums” — situations where departing workers are told they must accept an offer on the spot or lose it. The definition of “employer” is notably broad, explicitly encompassing governmental entities, meaning that public employers at every level will also need to overhaul their separation processes. The bill’s immediate‑effect provision means there will be no grace period; the moment Governor Hochul signs, every severance agreement with a New York employee must conform, even those already in negotiation but not yet finalized.

For employers, the practical implications are immediate and multifaceted. First, legal and HR teams must promptly revise severance agreement templates to include the mandatory notices, the 21‑day review period acknowledgment, the seven‑day revocation language, and the explicit statement that the agreement only becomes enforceable after the revocation window closes. Simply copying OWBPA language may not suffice because the New York law imposes a slightly different voluntary early‑signing standard. Second, communication protocols must be retrained: managers and HR professionals can no longer frame severance offers as “limited time” or “sign now” opportunities without risking a void agreement. Any hint of pressure could be interpreted as inducing early signature through improper means. Third, back‑end coordination with payroll and benefits must be realigned so that severance payments, benefit continuation, and final paychecks are not issued until after the seven‑day revocation period has run — otherwise, the employer could inadvertently make payments under a still‑voidable agreement, complicating restitution if the employee later revokes.