A federal judge in Virginia declined the DOJ's bid to force Google to divest AdX and DFP, instead imposing behavioral remedies. The sealed order, due for release in about two weeks, will clarify compliance obligations for Google's shrinking ad tech business.
Source: Daniel Sparks (us) · fool.com
The DOJ's amicus brief argues LLM training is 'exceedingly transformative' and warns the NYT's fair use reading would create anti-competitive entry barriers, a direct challenge to publisher copyright claims.
A Maryland federal judge preliminarily enjoined President Trump's August 6 executive order expanding birthright citizenship exclusions, calling it a 'distorted interpretation' of the Supreme Court's June 30 ruling. The decision re-affirms a nationwide class of children of noncitizen parents as citizens at birth. The case now moves toward the Fourth Circuit and a probable second Supreme Court confrontation.
Source: business-standard.com · economictimes.indiatimes.com
The Supreme Court's 6-3 majority vacated a district court injunction against Trump's mail-in ballot executive order on ripeness grounds, without reaching the merits. A separate August 11 injunction still blocks USPS enforcement nationwide. The ruling is a precedent-rich justiciability signal for election-law and RegTech practitioners tracking executive-branch election powers.
Source: economictimes.indiatimes.com · kelo.com
A D.C. federal judge imposed 73 months — 48 below the government's 121-month request — on Riley English for transporting inoperable firebombs to the Capitol with stated intent to kill Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. The court credited mental-health mitigation, self-reporting, and device non-functionality over DOJ's deterrence arguments, while a three-year supervised-release term extends monitoring. The ruling offers a practical anchor for threat-prosecution plea structuring and presentence advocacy in politically charged weapons cases.
Source: wesh.com · gulfcoastnewsnow.com
Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison asks a federal court to order Texas Gov. Greg Abbott to sign an extradition warrant for ICE agent Christian Castro before Texas's 90-day detention limit expires. The suit raises hard questions about state authority to prosecute federal officers for on-duty conduct and the ministerial duty of governors under the Extradition Clause. Litigators should watch whether a federal judge treats the Texas detention window as an emergency justifying injunctive relief.
Source: abc7ny.com · nydailynews.com
The Second Circuit's 2-1 ruling invalidates John Sarcone III's Albany appointment and disqualifies him from the Letitia James investigation — the third appellate rejection of the administration's unconfirmed US attorney process. The decision deepens a remedy split over whether dismissals follow when an invalidly appointed officer acted alone, teeing up Supreme Court review of the Appointments Clause.
Source: yahoo.com · wgal.com
The Supreme Court's one-sentence administrative stay, issued by Chief Justice Roberts, pauses a lower-court order that would have halted the White House ballroom by midnight — but expressly avoids the merits. For legal and RegTech professionals, the case is a live separation-of-powers and appropriations dispute, with the National Trust warning the administration is trying to 'outrun judicial review.' The next procedural step — referral to the full Court — will determine whether the stay becomes indefinite or the injunction is reinstated.
A former Michigan assistant U.S. attorney claims DOJ violated the Civil Service Reform Act, Administrative Procedure Act, and First and Fifth Amendments when she was fired for prosecuting eight anti-abortion activists under the FACE Act. The case adds to growing litigation over politically motivated removal of career federal prosecutors.
The Justice Department finalized a rule Aug. 17, 2026 creating an online portal for nonviolent felons to seek federal firearm-rights restoration. It is the first functioning federal mechanism since Congress froze ATF processing in 1992. Legal practitioners should watch for APA challenges and state-law conflicts.
Source: sun-sentinel.com · orlandosentinel.com
Attorney General Todd Blanche used his inaugural Justice Department address to reassert institutional norms—pledging impartial law enforcement, respect for the judiciary, and an end to 'performative attacks' on institutions. For legal and regulatory professionals, the speech signals a possible reset in enforcement philosophy after a year of firings, court backlash, and politicization claims.
Source: us.cnn.com · cnn.com
The EEOC faces a federal court fight over whether a December 10, 2025 administrative order paused all agency class claims. Its 'isolated incident' defense collides with plaintiff evidence of at least five stalled complaints against federal agencies.
The Boston federal court dismissal turns on the failure to demonstrate an ongoing Title VI violation, not merely past incidents, limiting the DOJ's use of historical campus events to claw back federal research funding. Compliance and legal teams should note the decision's implications for ongoing university antisemitism investigations.
Source: fox13news.com · fox10phoenix.com
A federal judge ruled the DOJ failed to prove an ongoing Title VI violation at Harvard, rejecting efforts to recoup billions in research grants. The decision narrows federal enforcement of campus antisemitism claims and offers a defense playbook for universities. An appeal is expected.
Source: pilotonline.com · sandiegouniontribune.com
Judge Richard Stearns dismissed the DOJ's Title VI suit against Harvard, finding isolated incidents insufficient to show ongoing discrimination. The ruling limits damages absent formal notice and leaves unresolved Harvard's First Amendment pretext defense.
Source: 790waeb.iheart.com · 650keni.iheart.com
In his first address as attorney general, Todd Blanche promised an impartial Justice Department run 'without fear or favor' — but offered no specifics on the politically charged investigations or the mass departures that have alarmed career attorneys. Confirmed by the narrowest of margins with two Republican defections, he faces an institutional credibility test that will be decided by enforcement conduct, not rhetoric.
The DOJ's findings against Duke Law extend the post-SFFA enforcement landscape, branding holistic essays and first-generation status as illegal racial proxies. For RegTech and legal professionals, this case clarifies the aggressive stance on proxy discrimination, exposing all institutions to heightened compliance risk and potential litigation.
The DOJ's findings letter against Duke Law School marks a significant enforcement action under the 2023 affirmative action ban, targeting proxy factors like diversity essays and first-generation status. This follows similar findings against Yale and UCLA medical schools and a June 2026 probe of 15 other institutions, raising urgent compliance questions for admissions practices nationwide.
Source: hindustantimes.com · news4jax.com
OpenAI will pay $3.2 million to settle DOJ allegations of immigration law violations, including a $1.2M civil penalty and $2M backpay fund. The case highlights intensifying enforcement of citizenship-status discrimination rules under the Protecting U.S. Workers Initiative, with mandatory policy overhauls and monitoring.
OpenAI and subsidiary Statsig will pay $3.2 million to settle INA discrimination claims, forcing policy overhauls and DOJ monitoring. The case sets a precedent for tech firms on PERM recruitment compliance.