DOJ's $22B Fox-Roku Probe Hits Second Request: What Lawyers Must Know

For competition and M&A lawyers, the reported move from an initial review to a second request is the clearest signal yet that the DOJ views Fox's $22 billion acquisition of Roku as a substantive antitrust risk, not a routine filing. The deal's mix of vertical integration and advertising concentration will demand deep factual development on platform access, data use, and content self-preferencing. Expect months of document production, possible remedy negotiations, and heightened uncertainty for deal timing.

The U.S. Department of Justice is reportedly expanding its antitrust review of Fox Corporation's proposed $22 billion acquisition of Roku, according to a Semafor report published Tuesday, Sept. 8, 2026, and carried by Reuters. The report, citing people familiar with the matter, said the DOJ intends to issue a "second request" for additional data and documents from both companies. This procedural step moves the review beyond the initial waiting period and signals that regulators are taking a harder look at a transaction that would reshape the streaming and broadcast television landscape. Reuters said it could not immediately verify the Semafor report, and the DOJ, Fox, and Roku did not immediately respond to requests for comment outside business hours.

“

Fox announced the acquisition in June 2026 as a cash-and-stock deal that would value Roku at $160 per share, consisting of $96 in cash and approximately 0.97 Fox Class A shares for each Roku share, for a total of about $22 billion.

Fox announced the acquisition in June 2026 as a cash-and-stock deal that would value Roku at $160 per share, consisting of $96 in cash and approximately 0.97 Fox Class A shares for each Roku share, for a total of about $22 billion. The strategic logic was to combine Fox's broadcast, news, and sports operations with Roku's streaming platform, giving Fox access to more than 100 million households that use Roku. Fox has said the deal would strengthen its advertising business, expand digital reach for sports and news content, and reduce its reliance on traditional cable TV distribution.

From a competitive standpoint, the combined company would become the third-largest player in TV viewing, behind YouTube and Disney and ahead of Netflix. That ranking is precisely why antitrust enforcers are likely concerned. The deal has both vertical and horizontal elements: Fox is a major content owner and programmer, while Roku is a leading streaming distribution platform with significant advertising inventory and viewer data. Regulators may examine whether Fox could favor its own content on Roku, disadvantage rival streaming services, leverage Roku's data to harm advertising competitors, or consolidate too much advertising market power. The DOJ's second request indicates it wants granular data on viewing behavior, ad pricing, content licensing, and platform access.

For legal and regulatory professionals, the second request is a major inflection point. Under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act, a second request extends the review process and often requires millions of documents, depositions, and months of compliance. Deals subject to second requests frequently face six to nine months of additional scrutiny, and some are abandoned, restructured, or litigated. The DOJ can seek remedies such as firewalls, non-discrimination conditions, or divestitures before clearing the deal. If the parties refuse, the government may sue to block. Fox CEO Lachlan Murdoch had earlier downplayed potential conflict, according to the report, but the reported escalation suggests the DOJ does not share that confidence.