Trump Furious After Supreme Court Upends Global Tariffs, Imposes New 10% Levy

The Supreme Court’s landmark 6-3 decision marks a historic curtailment of executive power over international trade, a domain that has seen unprecedented presidential expansion over the last decade. By ruling that the President cannot unilaterally impose global tariffs without specific Congressional authorization, the Court has effectively dismantled the primary leverage used by the administration to reshape global trade relations. This decision does not merely affect future policy; it creates an immediate and massive legal liability regarding the $175 billion already collected from U.S. importers under the now-invalidated tariff regime. The ruling suggests that the judiciary is increasingly skeptical of broad interpretations of national security statutes that have historically allowed the executive branch to bypass legislative oversight.

In the immediate wake of the ruling, global markets experienced a volatile 'relief rally' that quickly evaporated as the White House pivoted to an alternative legal strategy. President Trump’s response—a proclamation imposing a new 10% tariff on most imports for a 150-day window—utilizes a different statutory authority that permits temporary levies of up to 15% during periods of perceived economic or national emergency. This '150-day' strategy appears designed to maintain the administration's aggressive trade posture while buying time for legal teams to construct a more permanent defense or for the administration to seek new legislative powers from Congress. However, this stop-gap measure is itself likely to face immediate challenges in the U.S. Court of International Trade, as plaintiffs will argue it is a transparent attempt to circumvent the Supreme Court’s core finding.

“

President Trump’s response—a proclamation imposing a new 10% tariff on most imports for a 150-day window—utilizes a different statutory authority that permits temporary levies of up to 15% during periods of perceived economic or national emergency.

For the Legal and RegTech sectors, this development introduces a period of extreme complexity. The primary concern for corporate legal departments is the recovery of the $175 billion in duties paid. We expect a surge in class-action litigation and individual refund claims. RegTech providers must now facilitate a dual-track compliance environment: managing the immediate implementation of the new 10% levy—including its specific exemptions for critical minerals and energy products—while simultaneously auditing years of past transactions to prepare for potential retroactive credits. The administrative burden of tracking these shifting rates across thousands of Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) codes will necessitate advanced automated solutions that can adapt to 'regulation by proclamation' in real-time.

Furthermore, the ruling fundamentally alters the landscape of international diplomacy. Foreign governments, which had been negotiating under the threat of unilateral U.S. action, now perceive a weakened executive branch. This shift could lead to the stalling of several high-profile bilateral trade deals as partners wait to see if Congress will reassert its constitutional authority over commerce. Legal analysts and trade experts should watch for whether the administration attempts to invoke the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) as a more permanent workaround, a move that would likely trigger another constitutional showdown.

Ultimately, this ruling signals the end of an era of 'executive trade supremacy.' While the 150-day levy provides a temporary buffer, the long-term trend points toward a return to a more collaborative trade policy-making process involving both the legislative and judicial branches. For global supply chain managers and compliance officers, the takeaway is clear: the era of trade stability is still far off, and the ability to pivot compliance strategies in response to judicial rulings is now a core operational requirement.