Todd Blanche Faces AG Hearing as $1.8B Fund Draws Judicial Scrutiny

For legal professionals, Todd Blanche's confirmation hearing is more than a partisan contest: it tests the boundaries of prosecutorial independence and the very rule of law. As a former Trump personal lawyer now helming DOJ, Blanche orchestrated a $1.8 billion settlement that a federal judge has already condemned as an illegal earmarking of taxpayer money. This hearing will determine whether the Senate is comfortable with an attorney general who appears to have used his authority to resolve the president's private legal grievances while insulating him from future IRS scrutiny.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche faced the Senate Judiciary Committee on July 15, 2026, in a confirmation hearing whose outcome could reshape the Justice Department's independence for years to come. Already serving as the department's No. 2 official after an earlier, less contentious confirmation, Blanche now seeks to cement his tenure atop a DOJ that has become a lightning rod for accusations of politicized policing of President Trump's adversaries. His hearing is overshadowed by his role in a nearly $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund—part of a settlement ending Trump's lawsuit against the IRS over leaked tax returns—and by the administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files. With Democrats unified in opposition and a handful of Republican senators expressing grave misgivings, Blanche's path to confirmation hangs by a thread in a Senate where the GOP majority is razor-thin.

“

As a former Trump personal lawyer now helming DOJ, Blanche orchestrated a $1.8 billion settlement that a federal judge has already condemned as an illegal earmarking of taxpayer money.

The most incendiary issue is the IRS settlement. After bipartisan outcry, Blanche announced the anti-weaponization fund would not move forward, but the portion shielding Trump, his family, and his businesses from IRS audits of past tax returns remains intact. On July 13, 2026, a federal judge excoriated the Justice Department, ruling that the settlement attempted to 'earmark billions of dollars from American taxpayers to redress grievances not defined in the law.' The judge's rebuke injects a fresh, independent legal condemnation into the confirmation calculus, forcing Republican senators to weigh whether Blanche merely executed an order from above or actively enabled a constitutionally dubious arrangement. For legal observers, this is the crux: can an attorney general who oversaw such a settlement credibly assert the DOJ's independence from the White House?

Blanche's background as Trump's personal criminal defense lawyer amplifies these concerns. The attorney general traditionally serves as the nation's top law enforcement officer, not the president's advocate. His involvement in the Epstein files—another simmering controversy—further fuels suspicion that the DOJ under his leadership has been used to manage politically sensitive materials in ways favorable to the administration. Senators Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) and John Cornyn (R-Texas) are among those signaling unease, and their votes could determine whether Blanche is confirmed or rejected. With Democrats staunchly opposed, Blanche can afford to lose no more than a couple of Republicans.