Legal entity

Environmental Protection Agency

organization

regulation accounts for 9 of the 11 tracked stories, while 1 other category carries the remainder. Sentiment skews more negative than the wider beat, at 82% negative against 43% across all 1974 Legal stories in the same window. Each story carries 2.5 original sources on average, compared with 3.3 for the broader beat in this window.

Last mentioned: Mar 25, 2026

Entity pulse

Recent coverage · Environmental Protection Agency

11 stories
7.3 avg impact
18% positive
82% negative

Coverage balance Negative coverage leads. Negative coverage exceeds positive coverage by 64 percentage points.

  • 18% positive
  • 82% negative

Figures are computed live from our source-verified story record — see our methodology for how impact and sentiment are derived.

What the coverage shows about Environmental Protection Agency

regulation accounts for 9 of the 11 tracked stories, while 1 other category carries the remainder. Sentiment skews more negative than the wider beat, at 82% negative against 43% across all 1974 Legal stories in the same window. Each story carries 2.5 original sources on average, compared with 3.3 for the broader beat in this window. Environmental Protection Agency is most often covered alongside Trump Administration, which appears in 4 of these 11 stories. Across a 168-day span, the pace is roughly 0.5 stories per week. The busiest single day carried 3. The 7.3 average consequence score is above the beat benchmark of 6.4 in the same window. Environmental Protection Agency appears in 11 tracked Legal stories published from February 19, 2026 through August 5, 2026.

Stories tracked
11
Per week
0.5
Negative
82%
Sources per story
2.5

Computed from the 11 stories linked to this entity, with beat comparisons drawn from all 1974 Legal stories published in the same date window. Shares are omitted below five stories and comparisons below a twenty-story baseline.

Coverage cohort

Appears alongside

Other entities that clear the same relevance threshold in stories also covering Environmental Protection Agency. Shared-story counts are live from our verified record — not editorial picks.

Timeline

  1. En Banc Reversal

    The full D.C. Circuit rules that the EPA improperly terminated the grants, staying the decision pending a potential Supreme Court appeal.

  2. Full Appeals Court Rules EPA Terminations Improper

    The en banc D.C. Circuit rules the Trump EPA improperly ended $20 billion in climate funding but stays the decision for several days to allow a Supreme Court appeal.

  3. Multi-State Lawsuit Filed

    24 states and 10 cities sue to block the repeal in federal court.

  4. State Coalition Lawsuit

    US states file a joint lawsuit to block the EPA's repeal in federal court.

  5. EPA Repeal Announcement

    The Trump EPA formally moves to rescind the 2009 Endangerment Finding.

  6. EPA Repeals Finding

    The agency formally rescinds the 2009 determination.

  7. First Legal Challenge

    Public health and environmental groups file the first lawsuit against the repeal.

  8. EPA Revokes Finding

    The Trump administration formally terminates the 2009 endangerment finding.

  9. EPA Finalizes Repeal

    The Trump administration EPA finalizes the rule revoking the 2009 finding.

  10. Cleanup Delays

    DoD reports indicate extended timelines for base remediation projects.

  11. Three-Judge Panel Reverses Lower Court

    A divided D.C. Circuit panel rules that the EPA has broad discretion to cancel climate grants without facing illegality charges in federal court.

  12. Three-Judge Panel Rules for Trump Administration

    A divided D.C. Circuit panel reverses a lower court, holding the EPA’s grant terminations were not subject to judicial review, giving the executive branch broad cancellation power.

  13. EPA Final Rule

    EPA finalizes legally enforceable drinking water standards for six PFAS.

  14. EPA Health Advisory

    EPA issues non-binding health advisory for PFOA and PFOS.

  15. Vehicle Standards Implemented

    Federal rules limiting greenhouse gas tailpipe emissions for 2012-2027 models take effect.

  16. Endangerment Finding Issued

    EPA formally determines GHGs threaten public health and welfare.

  17. Massachusetts v. EPA

    Supreme Court rules GHGs are pollutants under the Clean Air Act.

  18. AFFF Adoption

    Military begins widespread use of PFAS-containing firefighting foam.

Stories mentioning Environmental Protection Agency 11

Regulation Negative

GOP's 'Clean Water For All Life Act' Targets Abortion Pills via EPA Regulation

House Republicans have introduced legislation that would criminalize flushing fetal remains, mandating the use of 'catch kits' for medical abortions to prevent alleged water contamination. The bill represents a novel attempt to use environmental protection frameworks to restrict reproductive healthcare access and ban telehealth services.

3 sources

Source: Alanna Vagianos (ca) · Alanna Vagianos (ca)

Regulation Negative

States Sue EPA Over Repeal of Landmark Climate Endangerment Finding

A coalition of 24 states and 10 cities has filed a lawsuit against the EPA to challenge the repeal of the 2009 endangerment finding, which identified greenhouse gases as a public health threat. This legal battle represents a critical juncture for U.S. environmental policy, as the repeal threatens the foundational legal basis for regulating emissions from vehicles and power plants.

2 sources

Source: Associated Press (zm) · Matthew Daly (us)

Regulation Negative

23 States Sue Trump EPA to Protect Landmark Climate Endangerment Finding

A coalition of 23 states has filed a major lawsuit against the Environmental Protection Agency to prevent the rescission of the 2009 Endangerment Finding. The legal challenge argues that the administration's attempts to decouple greenhouse gas emissions from public health threats violate the Clean Air Act and ignore decades of established climate science.

2 sources

Source: wmur.com · kmbc.com

Environmental Protection Agency is linked from 11 stories on this site, each scored at or above our 35% relevance threshold — see how these pages are built.

See something wrong on this page — a misattributed entity, a wrong stat, a broken source link? Report a data issue.