Legal entity

Letitia James

Person

Last mentioned: 23h ago

RSS updates
Share

Entity pulse

Recent coverage · Letitia James

↑
10 stories
6.9 avg impact
0% positive
80% negative

Coverage balance Negative coverage leads. Negative coverage exceeds positive coverage by 80 percentage points.

  • 20% neutral
  • 80% negative

Figures are computed live from our source-verified story record — see our methodology for how impact and sentiment are derived.

What the coverage shows about Letitia James

Against the same-window beat baseline of 40% negative, this entity's 80% share is more negative. Coverage clusters in regulation, which accounts for 6 of those 10, with the remainder spread across 1 other category. Letitia James is most often covered alongside Donald Trump, which appears in 3 of these 10 stories. Each story carries 2.6 original sources on average, compared with 3.5 for the broader beat in this window. That works out to roughly 0.5 stories per week across a 147-day span. The busiest single day carried 3. Their average consequence score of 6.9 runs above the beat's 6.3 for that window. Letitia James appears in 10 tracked Legal stories published from March 20, 2026 through August 13, 2026.

Stories tracked
10
Per week
0.5
Negative
80%
Sources per story
2.6

Computed from the 10 stories linked to this entity, with beat comparisons drawn from all 1032 Legal stories published in the same date window. Shares are omitted below five stories and comparisons below a twenty-story baseline.

Coverage cohort

Appears alongside

Other entities that clear the same relevance threshold in stories also covering Letitia James. Shared-story counts are live from our verified record — not editorial picks.

Timeline

  1. AP reveals ICE shock glove plan

    The Associated Press reports on ICE's plan, drawing criticism from Democratic elected officials and civil rights advocates.

  2. NY AG Letitia James warns of legal consequences

    James says she is outraged by the plan and warns ICE officers who misuse the gloves in New York could face criminal and civil consequences.

  3. ICE publishes procurement notice

    ICE announces plans to spend between $10 million and $20 million on conductive distraction and de-escalation devices, later identified as G.L.O.V.E. gloves.

  4. TRO expiration / preliminary injunction hearing (projected)

    The TRO is set to expire; a hearing on the states’ request for a preliminary injunction is expected around this date, which could extend the block indefinitely.

  5. 25 states file lawsuit

    A coalition of 25 U.S. states sues the Trump administration in the U.S. Court of International Trade, arguing the tariffs lack rational basis and exceed executive authority.

  6. New York AG files state lawsuit

    Attorney General Letitia James files a lawsuit in Manhattan state court alleging Kalshi is running an illegal gambling operation, seeking injunction, penalties, and restitution.

  7. New Section 301 tariffs take effect

    Tariffs of 10% and 12.5% are imposed on 60 trading partners under Section 301, replacing expired temporary 10% tariffs, with forced labor as the stated justification.

  8. Global 10% levy expires

    The previous 10% universal tariff on US imports, in effect for some time, reaches its expiration date.

  9. Temporary restraining order granted

    U.S. District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín grants a 14-day TRO, blocking the merger’s completion pending further court proceedings.

  10. Multistate antitrust lawsuit filed

    Twelve states, led by New York AG Letitia James, file suit in the Northern District of California alleging the Paramount-WBD merger would substantially lessen competition under the Clayton Act.

  11. Federal judge denies preliminary injunction

    A judge in the Southern District of New York denies Kalshi's request for a preliminary injunction against the Gaming Commission's actions.

  12. Injunction pending appeal denied

    The same federal judge denies Kalshi's motion for an injunction pending the outcome of its appeal.

  13. New Section 301 tariffs imposed

    The US imposes forced-labour tariffs of 10–12.5% on 60 countries covering 99.4% of imports, shortly after the prior levy expires.

  14. India bans forced-labour imports

    India amends its foreign trade policy to prohibit imports of goods made with forced labour, a move that later influences its tariff rate.

  15. 25% penetration and regulatory scrutiny

    Media report reveals Kroger has deployed ESL in nearly one in four stores; Senators Warren, Luján, Merkley and AG James publicly voice concerns about potential surge pricing.

  16. Multi-State Lawsuit Filed

    A coalition of 23 states and 14 cities files a legal challenge in the U.S. Court of Appeals.

  17. State Coalition Lawsuit

    24 states and 10 cities file a major challenge in the D.C. Circuit Court.

  18. First Legal Challenge

    Public health and environmental groups file the first lawsuit against the repeal.

  19. Supreme Court strikes down IEEPA tariffs

    The U.S. Supreme Court rules that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not authorize the president to unilaterally impose tariffs, forcing refunds to importers.

  20. EPA Revokes Finding

    The Trump administration formally terminates the 2009 endangerment finding.

Stories mentioning Letitia James 10

Regulation Negative

ICE's $20M Electric Shock Glove Plan Triggers Legal Liability Warning

ICE's solicitation for up to $20 million in electric shock gloves raises immediate use-of-force liability and oversight questions for law enforcement agencies and their counsel. New York AG Letitia James has already signaled potential criminal and civil exposure for officers who misuse the G.L.O.V.E. device. Legal teams should assess procurement authority, Fourth Amendment seizure standards, and state-level accountability frameworks.

3 sources

Source: news-gazette.com · click2houston.com

Regulation Neutral

25 States Challenge 10-12.5% Tariffs on 60 Countries

A 25-state lawsuit filed in the US Court of International Trade contends that the Trump administration’s use of Section 301 to impose forced-labour tariffs on 60 nations is an unlawful expansion of executive power. The case argues the levies are pretextual and violate procedural requirements, following a Supreme Court loss on similar trade measures. If successful, it could set a major precedent on presidential tariff authority.

2 sources
Court Decisions Neutral

20+ States Sue to Block Data Sharing of $16B TANF Program Recipients

A multistate coalition challenges a federal rule that would expose millions of TANF recipients’ personal data to cross-agency sharing, raising significant Administrative Procedure Act and Privacy Act claims. The suit tests the limits of executive power and could set precedent for data governance across all means-tested federal programs. Legal professionals must monitor the preliminary injunction ruling and its impact on federal-state privacy frameworks.

2 sources

Source: wcbi.com · wsls.com

Court Decisions Negative

25 States Sue Over 10–12.5% Section 301 Tariffs, Citing No Rational Basis

A coalition of 25 states challenges the Trump administration’s latest global tariffs in the Court of International Trade, arguing the forced-labor rationale is a pretext and the tariffs exceed executive authority. The case tests the limits of Section 301 and could hinge on whether the court finds a minimal rational connection to the stated purpose.

3 sources
Regulation Negative

HHS Freezes NY MFCU Funding Over Low Convictions, Legal Battle Looms

The federal government’s use of a funding freeze to enforce conviction quotas on New York’s Medicaid fraud unit is sparking constitutional and administrative law questions. AG Letitia James vows to fight, setting the stage for litigation over federalism and Spending Clause authority.

3 sources
Regulation Negative

States Sue EPA Over Repeal of Landmark Climate Endangerment Finding

A coalition of 24 states and 10 cities has filed a lawsuit against the EPA to challenge the repeal of the 2009 endangerment finding, which identified greenhouse gases as a public health threat. This legal battle represents a critical juncture for U.S. environmental policy, as the repeal threatens the foundational legal basis for regulating emissions from vehicles and power plants.

2 sources

Source: Associated Press (zm) · Matthew Daly (us)

Letitia James is linked from 10 stories on this site, each scored at or above our 35% relevance threshold — see how these pages are built.

See something wrong on this page — a misattributed entity, a wrong stat, a broken source link? Report a data issue.