regulation is the sole category represented across all 1 tracked stories. Augustine Lo is the most frequent co-covered peer, appearing in 1 of the 1 tracked story. At 7, the average consequence score sits above the same-window beat average of 5.4.
Figures are computed live from our source-verified story record
— see our methodology for how impact and
sentiment are derived.
What the coverage shows about Section 338, Tariff Act of 1930
regulation is the sole category represented across all 1 tracked stories. Augustine Lo is the most frequent co-covered peer, appearing in 1 of the 1 tracked story. At 7, the average consequence score sits above the same-window beat average of 5.4. Source depth averages 3 original sources per story, versus 2.4 across the same-window beat baseline. Section 338, Tariff Act of 1930 appears in 1 tracked Legal story from August 23, 2026.
Stories tracked
1
Sources per story
3
Computed from the 1 stories linked to this entity, with beat comparisons drawn from all 22 Legal stories published in the same date window. Shares are omitted below five stories and comparisons below a twenty-story baseline.
Coverage cohort
Appears alongside
Other entities that clear the same relevance threshold in stories also covering Section 338, Tariff Act of 1930. Shared-story counts are live from our verified record — not editorial picks.
Trump's 50% levy on $20 billion of Canadian goods revives Section 338 of the 1930 Tariff Act and reaches products once shielded by the USMCA, creating immediate statutory and treaty-conflict questions for trade counsel.
Section 338, Tariff Act of 1930 is linked from 1 story on this site, each scored at or above our 35% relevance threshold — see how these pages are built.
See something wrong on this page — a misattributed entity, a wrong stat, a broken source
link? Report a data issue.